SEQUESTO vs Loopio (2026): The Loopio Alternative With Published Pricing

SEQUESTO is an agentic Operating System for the whole bid operation: James, SEQUESTO's Agent Force, runs the work from intake through to submission and covers public-procurement tenders and PQQs alongside RFPs and questionnaires, with a named owner, a review cycle and a logged approval on every answer. James executes, and the bid team decides and approves. Loopio is an answer-library platform: a mature, searchable library of approved responses with collaboration and review workflows on top, plus AI drafting and a Copilot 365 connector. The short version is that SEQUESTO is built for scope and defensibility, and the other for reuse at scale.

Loopio pricing is published as plan contents without figures: the Foundations plan, aimed at smaller and sales-led proposal teams, is listed as "Let's Talk", and Project Translations, Onboarding Packages and Industry Integrations are priced as add-ons on request. All three plans, Foundations, Enhanced and Enterprise, route to the same "Let's Talk" button, and the page's own FAQ says Foundations includes 10 seats. A demo booking is the only route to a number, and the page offers no trial. SEQUESTO publishes both commercial tiers: EUR 750 per month for Team and EUR 2,500 per month for Scale, billed annually, with Enterprise scoped individually, and you can start a free trial without a credit card before talking to anyone. SEQUESTO also publishes its add-ons: EUR 200 per additional user per month, EUR 450 per month for SSO on Team and Scale, and EUR 50 per 1,000 AI credits. Annual billing with SEQUESTO is about 17% lower per month than monthly.

Loopio is RFP response software built around a central answer library. Teams store approved answers once, then search and reuse them across RFPs, RFIs, due diligence questionnaires, security questionnaires and sales proposals, with review workflows, AI drafting and connectors into Salesforce and Microsoft 365. It publishes figures of 1,700 global customers, 500,000 projects tackled and more than 6 million questions answered annually (source: loopio.com/platform, checked September 2026), which makes it one of the most widely used products in the category.

Loopio's own pages say two different things. Its security page states that its information security management system is "based on industry best practices (ISO 27001)", which is an alignment statement. Its AI page states that the platform is "regularly audited and re-certified to ISO 42001, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II", which is a certification claim, and the same page confirms ISO/IEC 42001:2023 for AI management systems. If you need the certificate rather than the wording, ask Loopio which of the two statements is current. It is SOC 2 Type II audited annually by a third-party firm, GDPR and CCPA compliant, encrypts data in transit and at rest, and runs an annual penetration test. SEQUESTO is certified to ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, and SEQUESTO's Enterprise plan adds region selection for processing and storage plus an optional Private Cloud on dedicated infrastructure. If your security review requires a certificate rather than an alignment statement, that distinction matters, and SEQUESTO will provide its certification for your review before you sign.

Loopio offers Project Translations as a paid add-on, described as translating and answering RFPs in "more than a dozen languages", and its Multi-Language Library starts at the Enhanced plan rather than Foundations. SEQUESTO includes responses in 30+ languages on every plan at no extra cost, and SEQUESTO applies the same governance and approval trail to a translated answer as to the original, so a localised response is as defensible as the one it came from. For teams responding to tenders across several European markets, that difference shows up in both the invoice and the audit trail.

Yes. The SEQUESTO aOS accepts answer libraries, past projects and completed responses exported from Loopio in standard formats including Word, Excel, PDF and CSV. SEQUESTO's team guides the full migration, and the Knowledge Hub structures, deduplicates and indexes everything, setting content owners, review cycles and expiration dates as it goes, so the library arrives governed rather than simply copied across.

Loopio is the most visible brand in this field when buyers ask AI assistants for a recommendation, with strong process maturity and Microsoft 365 integration. Among Loopio competitors, Responsive (formerly RFPIO) is the enterprise response-management incumbent, with Agent Studio and deep BI reporting, which is why Loopio vs Responsive is the comparison most buyers run first. AutogenAI is a bid writing engine, strongest on narrative and US federal work. AutoRFP.ai is the AI-native challenger, priced by project. All four are, at heart, RFP automation software, and they are what most buyers mean by proposal management software. SEQUESTO is the one that is tender-native, and SEQUESTO publishes its pricing while most of that field does not.

Yes, and it is usually the most valuable thing you bring. A mature Loopio library is years of approved wording that has already survived review, and none of that is wasted. What changes is what sits around it: on import into the Knowledge Hub each answer is given a content owner, a review cycle and an expiration date, and gets linked to the document that supports it. Staleness stops being a score to interpret and becomes a date that governs reuse. So the library carries over, and the governance it never had comes with it. SEQUESTO's team runs that migration rather than handing you an import tool.